Why HR Still Has No Seat at the Table

Karen Matthews had spent the better part of her career mastering what most would consider the intangible: culture, behavior, the slow reshaping of what organizations come to expect from their people.

By the time she reached the CHRO role at a mid-sized tech firm—fast-growing, VC-backed, publicly aspirational—she was fluent in what the executive world expected from HR. Metrics. Alignment. “Strategic partnering.” She could translate engagement survey results into investor narratives. She could benchmark leadership pipelines against peer groups. She knew the language. She knew the optics. And she knew how to present an initiative in six slides or fewer.

So when she stepped into that boardroom in the spring of 2018, she wasn’t winging it. Her presentation had been rehearsed. Vetted by finance. Endorsed by the COO. It was, on paper, a perfect plan: a workforce architecture initiative that aligned hiring and development strategies to a major product launch.

She delivered the proposal, tracked through each slide, made eye contact with every decision-maker in the room. And when she finished, she waited.

The room didn’t reject her idea.
It simply moved on.

The Chair glanced down at his notes. The CFO reached for his water. The agenda advanced to a discussion about cybersecurity. And just like that, the plan—months in the making—vanished without ever being debated.

Later, in private, the feedback came in like a trickle.

“You should tie it more directly to revenue,” said the CFO.
“Try starting with business risk next time,” offered the COO.
“You might want to frame it less like HR and more like operations,” the CEO said gently.

It was the kind of advice people give when they don’t know why something didn’t land—but feel compelled to be helpful.

Karen smiled, thanked them, and returned to her office. But deep down, she already knew.

The problem wasn’t her framing.

It was that the system didn’t recognize HR as part of the machinery of consequence.

And in a room like that, what isn’t consequential… is invisible.

The Invisible System That Decides Everything

In most organizations, authority isn’t declared. It’s structural.

Power rests not in title, but in the quiet systems that determine how things get done: who approves what, who controls the cadence, who owns the metrics others must respond to.

There are five such levers:

• Standards – who defines what “good” looks like

• Structure – who reports to whom, and why

• Systems – the platforms and tools that convert expectations into workflow

• Signals – what gets measured, monitored, and publicly surfaced

• Sanctions – what happens when people don’t do what’s expected

These five levers, together, form the operating core of an organization. They determine behavior more than policy. They shape culture more than values posters. And they enforce reality more than any motivational program ever will.

In theory, HR should own these.

In practice, it rarely does.

Case Study: The CHRO Who Owned Nothing—And Still Got Blamed

In 2021, a Fortune 500 retail brand quietly launched a diversity initiative. The messaging was polished, the website updated, and the CHRO given carte blanche to “lead the culture evolution.”

But behind the scenes, the real power structure didn’t change.

• Leadership accountability wasn’t embedded into performance reviews.

• DEI training wasn’t tied to advancement criteria.

• The systems used to assign high-visibility projects still ran through unmonitored manager discretion.

• And the compensation committee, which held sway over internal mobility, reported to finance—not HR.

Six months in, participation rates had dropped. High-potential talent from underrepresented groups continued to exit. And an internal memo began to circulate asking whether HR had overpromised.

What the CHRO didn’t say publicly—but admitted to her team—was that they never owned the infrastructure.

HR had been given responsibility. But not control.
And when the system failed to deliver?
It was HR that took the fall.

The Strategic Partner Trap

Since the late 1990s, HR has been taught to think of itself as a “strategic partner.” The phrase, coined with good intent, became doctrine: align with the business, mirror its language, be close to decision-making.

But “partner” is a generous word. Partners share control.

In most enterprises, HR is treated more like a service provider—consulted occasionally, involved sporadically, praised for initiative… but quietly bypassed when decisions carry real weight.

CHROs often describe this paradox without naming it. They say things like:

“I’m in the room, but I’m not driving the agenda.”
“They say they value culture, but it’s always the first thing cut.”
“They want me to lead, but they haven’t given me the levers that shape behavior.”

This isn’t a performance gap. It’s a power design flaw.

And no amount of proximity can fix a jurisdiction problem.

Case Study: Redesigning HR from Infrastructure, Not Initiatives

Contrast this with what happened at a heavy equipment manufacturing firm in the U.S. Midwest.

When the new CHRO stepped in, she made a simple decision: she wouldn’t launch a single initiative until she controlled at least one system that shaped daily behavior.

She began with job architecture—not to make things cleaner, but to lock performance standards into the HRIS platform. That change alone made it impossible for managers to override promotion criteria without documentation and audit trails.

Then she tackled the performance management system. Instead of using it for developmental feedback, she re-engineered it to track leadership compliance with behavioral expectations. Executives received scorecards showing how often their teams deviated from those standards—and how that correlated with turnover, safety incidents, and team productivity.

She didn’t host workshops. She installed consequence logic into the system.

And something shifted.

For the first time, operational leaders came to HR—not to be trained, but to understand how to navigate the system HR now controlled.

Within twelve months:

• High-performer retention rose by 41%

• Leadership succession gaps closed by 23%

• HR was given budget approval authority on three cross-functional systems

When the CEO was asked what changed, his answer was simple:
“HR stopped advising—and started governing.”

How System Ownership Quietly Repositions HR

In each of these examples, the shift was not about storytelling, branding, or influence. It was about something quieter and more permanent: infrastructure control.

When HR controls:

• the cadence by which behavior is reviewed

• the platforms through which expectations are operationalized

• the logic by which compliance is enforced

…it no longer has to earn a seat at the table.

It becomes the table.

Power stops being performative. It becomes procedural.

And that’s what most CHROs—still trained to perform strategic alignment—don’t realize: culture work only matters if it’s tied to systems people can’t ignore.

What Every HR Leader Can Do Now

Not every HR professional can overhaul the enterprise on day one. But the path back to control always begins with reclaiming architecture, not persuasion.

Start here:

• Audit which levers you actually own. What platforms, standards, signals, or enforcement mechanisms fall under your domain—not in theory, but in functional authority?

• Choose one system to re-engineer. Start small. Shift the onboarding workflow. Redesign the meeting cadence. Recode the language of job levels. But embed behavior into system—not values statements.

• Create consequence pathways. If a leadership behavior is expected, what happens when it isn’t delivered? Who sees it? Who’s accountable? What changes as a result?

• Make HR the gatekeeper of advancement. Not through soft influence—but through formal mechanisms: eligibility audits, promotion panels, enforcement reviews.

The goal isn’t visibility.
It’s inevitability.

Karen, Revisited

Karen Matthews never gave that presentation again. The next year, she left the company and took a role with a mid-sized firm undergoing a strategic overhaul.

This time, she didn’t lead with culture. She led with cadence.

She rebuilt the performance review cycle to feed into quarterly operations meetings. She embedded HR metrics into enterprise risk dashboards. And she refused to sponsor any initiative unless her team had edit rights to the system it depended on.

When the CFO asked why she was being so particular, her answer was simple:

“If we don’t own the system, we’ll get blamed when it fails—but we’ll be powerless to prevent it.”

The CEO backed her.

And within a year, HR had moved from a reporting line under finance… to a peer seat on the operating committee.

Karen didn’t get louder.
She got architectural.

Final Thought

The seat at the table was always the wrong goal.

The real lever was ownership—not of messaging, but of machinery.

HR doesn’t need more influence workshops.
It needs control over the five enterprise levers that drive behavior, enforce consequence, and scale culture beyond inspiration.

Because the system will always win.

The only question is whether HR is designing it… or serving it.

You’ve been expected to lead without power. That ends here.
Join the The HR System Redesign Sprint™. A fixed, high-impact engagement that dismantles the outdated frameworks slowing you down—and rebuilds HR as apowercenter.
Fix the system →